![]() |
||
| November 3 , 2004 Vol. 30 No. 13 |
$1.00
INCL GST
|
|
Open for Business:
|
||||||||||||
| In this issue... |
||
| |
||
Doug Fraser, vice-president of the Beef Initiative Group, checks his herd of Hereford cattle at his ranch northwest of Okotoks. Fraser has spent the last few weeks on Ottawa, Manitoba and Saskatchewan lobbying for support of the group’s beef packing plant proposal. The Saskatchewan government has pledged support for the packer-owned facility. photo by John Barlow
Saskatchewan government throws support behind the Beef Initiative Group
By John Barlow
Editor
A made-in-Alberta initiative to address the mad cow crisis is getting
overwhelming support in Saskatchewan while the local government
remains cool.
Last week the Saskatchewan provincial government announced it will
back construction of a producer-owned beef processing plant in the
prairie province — a project spearheaded by the Beef Initiative
Group (BIG).
BIG is an organization founded by local ranchers including vice-presidents
Grant Hirsche of High River, Doug Fraser of Okotoks and president
Cam Ostercamp of Blackie.
“This is huge news for us,” said Ostercamp. “The
Saskatchewan government recognizes their problems will continue
if and when the border opens.”
Last week representatives from BIG toured Manitoba and Saskatchewan
after a trip to Ottawa to lobby for federal support of the project.
Saskatchewan Agriculture Minister Mark Wartman attended a BIG meeting
in Tisdale, Saskatchewan last week and he was convinced to pledge
his support for the initiative.
“These guys are not whistling in the dark,” said Wartman
during an interview on Friday. “They have done their research.
They have a good idea.
“We are seeing some producers have hope and if we can find
a long-term solution there will be a lot of happy people in this
industry.”
The BIG concept is to build a slaughter plant with a capacity to
process 1,200 to 1,500 head per day.
The plant will be for cull cattle, cattle over 30 months old, and
be financed through government bridge funding that would be repaid
through a $3 levy applied to every producer-owned animal. The levy
would have a sunset clause so once the debt is repaid the levy will
cease to exist and producers who have paid into the plant through
the levy will become owners in the facility through shares.
Ostercamp said a lease operator will manage, market and operate
the facility — it will not be operated by the producers.
One of the focal points of the proposed facility is that it be designed
around BSE testing — all animals processed at the plant will
be tested for BSE. In doing so it is hoped the plant can market
its product to global markets such as Japan and China.
That is an idea that appeals to Wartman.
“I have seen what happens when we depend on one market,”
said Wartman referring to the fact that close to 80 per cent of
Canadian beef exports go to the United States.
The United States has closed its borders to live cattle imports
from Canada since May, 2003 when one case of mad cow disease was
discovered in Alberta.
There has been little movement regarding the opening of the border
and the Canadian cattle industry has been crippled in the process.
Cattle prices were $1.10 per pound in May, 2003 before mad cow,
but plummeted to as low as 37 cents per pound in July, 2003. Prices
have rebounded somewhat to about 80 cents per pound.
Although the Saskatchewan government has agreed to support the project,
it will not bankroll construction of the facility.
“We don’t have the treasury to fund it, but we will
back the feasibility study,” confirmed Wartman.
Wartman said he saw the number of Saskatchewan ranchers putting
down their $100 BIG membership fees in Tisdale and that convinced
him that the government needed to be involved somehow.
Ostercamp said they will continue to lobby for federal bridge financing
(an estimated $125 million) and proceed with the feasibility study
which will address issues such as location.
“This study is crucial because this is a concept that is unique
to North America,” explained Ostercamp. “This will be
the cornerstone of an industry that is missing export potential
for producers who surrender that to American-owned packing plants
and we want to change that. We want to lay the foundation of a Canadian
producer-owned packing industry.”
Ostercamp said he hoped the feasibility study would be complete
in January, 2005.
Construction will depend on federal support of which Ostercamp is
confident will come to fruition.
“It is politically sexy because it will demonstrate to taxpayers
that the federal government is investing in long-term infrastructure
with a solid payback plan in place,” said Ostercamp.
Should the feds commit to the project, supporters hope the facility’s
approvals will be fast-tracked so construction can begin as soon
as possible.
Although the BIG vision seems to be gathering steam in Saskatchewan
and Manitoba, Ostercamp said he is disappointed the Alberta government
has failed to jump on board.
Wartman said he believes the Alberta government remains hesitant
due to its ties to American packing plants in High River (Cargill)
and Tyson Foods (Brooks).
However, he said sooner or later, Ralph Klein’s Tories will
see the light.
“There are some real challenges in Alberta because of foreign
investment in their slaughter market,” said Wartman. “I
hope the Alberta government realizes where their producers are.
But I have a hunch (the Alberta government) will get involved. I
hope (BIG) gets all the help they need.”
|
|
||||||||
| News Stories | Editorial | What's Happening | Sports | Archives | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Published Wednesdays at Okotoks, Alberta, Canada. Serving the communities of Okotoks, Aldersyde, Black Diamond, DeWinton, Longview, Millarville, Priddis, Turner Valley, Bragg Creek, and the rural ratepayers of the M.D. of Foothills. And now the World. Established August 3, 1976. |